Stryd vs garmin foot pod

Stryd vs garmin foot pod

By focussing on power over pace, this tiny bit of tech claims it can help us avoid those mile 20 blow ups and land more PBs. And is this extra accessory really worth the investment? Stryd is a small shoe-worn pod that clips effortlessly onto your shoe laces a bit like a marathon race-timing chip.

Inside the lightweight, 10g carbon-fibre enhanced pod are sensors that measure the acceleration of your foot horizontally, vertically and laterally as it strikes the ground. This information is crunched by a clever algorithm and used to provide your running power, in watts. Bluetooth wireless connectivity then fires your power stats to either to the partner smartphone app so you can use Stryd without a running watch or to one of a long list of compatible GPS running watches or running services so you can see your running power in real time on your wrist.

It works for outdoor and indoor runs alike and power can be used to guide training and racing. While Stryd is mainly about power it also provides pace, distance and speed to a highly accurate level without using GPS.

Post-run you can also dig into a range of other running form metrics such as, cadence, leg spring stiffness and running form power. Alongside that Stryd will assess the stress load of your run, a stat that can be used to monitor overall training load.

You can add third party heart rate sensors into the mix too, to bring another layer of useful data to the Stryd stats. Cyclists have long been using power as a way to monitor workrate and provide a consistent measurement for training and racing.

This means we now have a tool that can help us run smarter, for example, running at a consistent effort over hilly courses. Whereas heart rate suffers a lag, power responds in real time making it easier to hit the sweet spot on intervals sessions.

Perhaps most importantly though, and the thing we liked best about Stryd, was that it can help us improve our race pacing and stop us going out too fast, running hills too hard during races and helping us to run our true potential by keeping us moving just under that threshold line. And that means no blowing up at mile For a more detailed look at what running power has to offer, you can read our guide to running power.

The race power calculator: Like any metric, knowing how to apply it effectively is vital, particularly come race day. Stryd makes it easy to set a power target for distances from 5km to the marathon.

You simply enter a recent time from a 5km10kmhalf or full marathon into the calculator, choose your target race distance and hit calculate.Stryd is one of the most useful and impressive running technologies available.

It's a Footpod that analyzes the movement of your foot with greater accuracy than most traditional Footpods, and with vastly greater accuracy than GPS. While a lot of the Stryd marketing focuses on their "running power meter" functionality, I see the greatest value coming from their accurate measurement of pace and distance.

It accurate enough that it really doesn't need any calibration, and unlike GPS, it should work in any situation see below for details. Not only is it providing accurate distance measurement, but it provides real-time pace, something that's impractical to achieve with any GPS device.

While I believe Running Power Meters are quite different to cycling power meters and are more of a "power estimate" than a meter, I think that Stryd's power estimate has improved to the point where it's a valuable training and racing tool. This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocityor the need to keep vendors happy.

It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions. Note that Stryd provides no information on foot strike parameters such as pronation, or foot landing position.

The Stryd pod is similar to other Footpods. It's slightly larger than most, and has an LED status light on the top. Stryd uses a rechargeable battery that they claim lasts about 20 hours. That's good enough for most runners, but may be a problem for longer ultramarathons. Stryd recharges through a small cradle earlier versions used wireless charging.

Stryd uses a 9-axis sensor rather than the typical Footpod that uses a 3-axis sensor. The Stryd pod weighs 0. Stryd doesn't provide any details of the waterproof rating of their pod. Stryd claim IP67 waterproofing, which is safe for submersion to 1 meter. However, that means that you can't run through water as the pressure due to foot movement will exceed the pressure. That would mean taking the pod off if you're going through water that will cover the pod, though I suspect you should be okay if you walk through slowly.

The pod has an LED on top the white area near the middle that's used to convey status. The charging cradle is not much bigger than the pod, which is nice for travelling. It's important to realize that Stryd is not a Power Meter in the way that cyclists have power meters. Stryd does not measure power in direct, absolute terms, but creates a mathematical estimation based on running pace and incline and possibly other factors. This means that you can't easily use Stryd to evaluate improvements in running form or Running Economythough looking at the power estimate against heart rate might give some interesting insights.

However, I've found Stryd's power estimate to be quite useful in the real world. It allows for far more accurate pacing over undulating terrain than pace or heart rate. It can be a bit of a shock to see just how slow you have to go uphill to maintain an even effort!

stryd vs garmin foot pod

Earlier versions of the Stryd firmware tended to dramatically underestimate the effort of running downhill, but as of 1. The graphs below are showing my runs up and down a local hill. In these tests, I'm aiming to keep an even effort based on the Stryd power estimate. You can see that not only is the Stryd power estimate reasonably stable, but so is my heart rate, indicating that the Stryd estimate is doing a remarkably good job across dramatically different inclines.

Though this is still a modeled, estimated power intensity, it's far better than anything else available to us and is good enough for real world usage.

Polar Vantage M vs Garmin Forerunner 945

If you need to accurately pace yourself on undulating terrain Boston marathon anyone? Then I'd heartily recommend using Stryd. Of course, you'll need to work out what your estimated power level should be in order to match your target race time, and this is something you'll have to do by trial and error.

Simply run a course of the mirrors the race terrain and compare your average pace to your target pace.Or you can skip to final thoughts…up to you. Side by side the watches look nice, being similar in size and close in weight. Garmin is 47 x 47 x 13,7 mm and weights 50g, being a bit lighter than Vantage V which has 66g and measuring 46 x 46 x 13 mm.

The Garmin has a plastic case, which makes it light and easy to wear, but less stylish than the Finish design which in my opinion looks great on hand, being more suitable for formal wear.

Could this pod power you to a new PB? A review of the Stryd power sensor

The screen size is the same — 1. The screens are easy to read in visible light, not that much inside in darker rooms. To address this with Garmin, you can use the lighter background and then things get better in the darker environments.

When it comes to fonts and typography, I like the Polar ones more — but that can be addressed with Garmin by using a different watch face, so not much of a deal. The drawback is that you need to take care of the screen touches, it may change some settings without your notice, though in general benign settings. The screens of both watches are Gorilla glass covered, so prone to scratch; if you want them to look pristine, add some screen protectors for any of the devices.

Activity tracking is one important component of these watches job and they perform very well at that albeit differently.

stryd vs garmin foot pod

You can define your target of steps and floors for every day, or let Garmin choose for you using some trends to motivate you. Polar as a concept of measuring activity described here which translates all your activities into equivalent steps and distance — the measurement against your level target Level 1 to 3 being a percentage displayed on tha watch in also in the apps mobile and web. It might be worthy of being mentioned the fact that I used Polar on my right hand and Garmin on my left, myself being a right handed guy ….

Usually, Polar reports a higher number. The one calculated for me by different websites including myfitnesspal. In terms of looking at your activity data, both Garmin and Polar provide you with a lot of details and statistics, the way the information is presented differs, but you can get an idea of how you did over the day. During my usage in parallel of the two devices, I found that Garmin is collecting more information about your activity and displays that in either the mobile app or the web app, not to mention the widgets available on the watch.

On the other hand, Garmin added some gamification in the app, allowing you to have contests with friends, ranking you and even giving you badges for doing some activities and sports.

Garmin also offers period tracking in the apps mobile and web with a ConnectIQ widget also available on the watch. Polar comes with a longer list of predefined sportsI only tried a few, but basically those are slight variations of the same sport profile collecting HR data and move data with GPS on. More details about managing the sports profiles available for the watch here.

When you have a training plan defined for running for example, your watch will take the predefined workout and present that as a option to execute on that session; Garmin has also the possibility to select other workouts from your training calendar, giving you more flexibility. More details about those options are available here.This tiny pod, about the size of a piece of small candy, essentially provides the existing Running Dynamics data i.

All while doing so in something not much bigger than a peanut. So only about pages or so. Just the way I roll. That should work, right? If for no other reason than I have a bag of candy. I mean, bags of candy, sitting around. The RD pod is small. Smaller than a Garmin footpod for example.

Instead, it takes a CR coin cell battery. But how big is the unit? Well, I set out to the grocery store to find something to compare it to.

A pile of candy bags later, I figured I had some valid comparison options that folks can find the world around. They both fit perfectly. As you probably ascertained from the earlier photo of the candy inside the pod clip, the pod does fit inside a small rubber clip. Thus how it attaches to your person.

Or rather more specifically, the Running Dynamics data from those devices. The idea behind it is with the rise of optical HR sensors, it seemed silly to keep requiring people to buy HR straps — creating duplication. Yet, that was the case for anyone that wanted the additional data. So the pod clips to the back of your running shorts, in many ways like the initial prototype Stryd Running Power Meter didor, how the Lumo pod does.

It does NOT clip to your running shoes. It is NOT a footpod. Nor, is it a candy to eat a mistake I almost made a moment ago while eating some of those Maltesers in a small pile next to my laptop.

Note that your Garmin wearable already measures cadence via the wrist, so this is doubling down on that. At this time these are as follows:.First off, I need to make something crystal clear.

There are actually two different Garmin Pods. It can actually go head to head with the Stryd in terms of features. Take Note — It clips onto your waist, rather than your foot. The tech in this product is much older.

But there are some other key things that you need to be aware of…. The lack of compatible devices is the biggest weakness of the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod. On the other end of the spectrum, the Stryd sensor is compatible with most GPS running watches from Garmin, Polar, Suunto and other leading brands. In total, there are 3 Garmin products which measure running power:. The last thing on this front is that you need to download the Garmin Running Power App to bring all this information together, and integrate the stats with your watch.

The biggest drawback is price. The Garmin Running Dynamics Pod is better if you want to unlock running power and other advanced running stats, without breaking the bank. But you must check that your watch is compatible. When used properly, the Stryd can gives you access to a metric real time running powerthat makes it very clear when you are pushing yourself too hard during a race.

This is especially useful for tackling uphill and downhill sections of a course. The video below also gives a nice summary of the main benefits of the Stryd Foot Pod. It can turn an advanced Garmin running watch into a super advanced Garmin running watch. This 50 second video also summarizes the benefits quite nicely, in a way which makes the stats very easy to understand.

The only other thing that might be worth mentioning is that the Polar Vantage V actually measures running power directly from the watch ie no Stryd sensor, running pods or chest belts required. Lastly, if you want to read more about Garmin Running Power and the other ways you can access it, this post has a lot more details. Stryd vs Garmin Running Dynamics Pod. Garmin Pod See Price. Stryd Pod See Price.

Uses data from watch. In-built or from watch. Device Compatibility. The tables below should clear up any confusion here. Stryd Foot Pod - Comptatible Devices.

What's the biggest benefit of owning the Stryd? What's the biggest benefit of owning the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod? Is there anything else worth mentioning? Garmin Running Dynamics Pod. Stryd Foot Pod.Swim Bike Run. Search menu.

Race Calendar RD Aids. Slowtwitch coaching Coaches Directory. Workshops F. Compex Elite vs Performance - which one to get? Is a Normatec really worth it?

Affordable Recovery Boots from Amazon.

stryd vs garmin foot pod

Ventum Official Ventum Owners Thread. Ok Fishes, here is the interview we were all waiting for!! August Fish thread 10k swim training. Atrial Fibrillation what is Afib, really? Is swimming safe? Glute tightness and IT band issues 1 year anniversary of IT band syndrome! Mad Calf Disease Runners, calf strain? Mad Calf Disease How long to recover from a calf heart attack Help with calf issues! Calf muscle pull or tear? Poll Stationary Bike and Position.

Road bike. Tri bike in aero. Tri bike in pursuits. You don't ride stationary. View Results. Login required to started new threads Login required to post replies. Post 1 of 22 views. Looking to maybe get into some Zwift running and debating going with Garmin or Stryd. I'm also curious about run power.

Has the technology for running power stabilized to make it a good investment? Make Inside Out Sports your next online tri shop! Quote Reply. Post 2 of 22 views. BryanD wrote:. Post 3 of 22 views. That's what I thought. With no strain gauges, it's just an algorithm guessing your power.

Post 4 of 22 views. One of them is accurate as far as pace goes. That said, while I use the power field on the watch, I only pay attention to the pace.The Polar Vantage M is a budget friendly GPS triathlon watch that you should meet the needs of any athlete that specializes in endurance sports.

The same can be said of the Forerunnnerexcept the FR also introduces a huge array of technological features in addition to excellent triathlon tracking. In fact, the Forerunner is basically a Garmin Fenix 6 Pro, with a smaller frame and a more affordable price tag. In this post, we are going to unpack all the key similarities and all the key differences between these two watches, to help you understand which unit is better suited to your needs and budget. It might not boast all the technological bells and whistles found in the Forerunnerbut it still performs exceptionally well as a dedicated sports watch for endurance athletes.

The number of sports modes that the Polar Vantage M can track borders on ridiculous. Where the Forerunner can track 30 sports and activities in total, the Vantage M ups the ante with more than This is a solid win for the Forerunner The Polar Vantage M excels as a multisport triathlon watch for people who are focused exclusively on endurance sports. The Forerunner also excels as a multisport GPS triathlon watch, but it has the added benefit of premium Smartwatch features.

You can download additional apps from Garmin connect store, customize the watch face, send an automatic safety alert via your phone if something goes wrong, and a whole lot more.

Ultimately, the FR is a more competent smartwatch than the Vantage M. Fortunately, you will have no such issues if you go for the Forerunner However, the FR was the first Forerunner to receive this premium feature, making the value offering of the watch very solid overall. Garmin ClimbPro gives you a better understanding of all the upcoming climbs along your training route when running our cycling outdoors.

It detects all the climbs, and makes all the important information available to you as you approach it.

stryd vs garmin foot pod

This includes:. This is a nice touch. Factoring in the contours of the route helps the watch set an achievable pace during challenging sections of a course. The Vantage M will basically summarize your movement patterns, calories burned and miles walked during a round of golf.

Conversely, the Forerunner will give you all the same fitness stats, and very valuable golf data, including:. In other words, the Forerunner is comparable to a dedicated golf watch. The same cannot be said for the Vantage M. Even though the Forerunner is the overall victor of this product battle, the Vantage M is still a very high quality triathlon watch with a much more affordable price tag.

Ultimately, it may boil down to this:. Official Garmin Forerunner Product Page. What are the main differences between the Polar Vantage M and the Forerunner ? Pulse Oximeter — The FR has a pulse oximeter which can measure your blood oxygen levels. The Vantage M does not. Smart Features — The Forerunner is a much better smartwatch. You can download custom apps from Garmin connect, send automatic safety alerts, store music, make payments and a whole lot more.

Music Storage — This is a key selling point for the FR Stress Tracking — The Forerunner gives you access to stress tracking features. Genuine golf mode — Simply put, the FR has the same features that you would expect in a dedicated golf watch. This is great for running, cycling and hiking outdoors.

There is no equivalent feature on the Vantage M. Vantage M See Price. FR See Price. Polar Vantage M.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *